Appeal No. 97-1204
Application No. 08/453,948
information." Clearly, these operations are not the same nor
are they equivalent or even related. This is especially
apparent in view of appellants' definition of "compounding"
information appearing at page 5 of the instant specification.
No special information, or tag, is assigned, along with the
instructions stored in Pomerene’s cache in order to determine
if two or more instructions may be executed in parallel.
Thus, we do not find the teachings of Pomerene to be
combinable with those of Jardine in any manner which would
arrive at the instant claimed subject matter.
The examiner’s decision rejecting claims 9 through 16, 24
and 25 under 35 U.S.C. 103 is reversed.
No period for taking any subsequent action in connection
with this appeal may be extended under 37 CFR § 1.136(a).
REVERSED
ERROL A. KRASS )
Administrative Patent Judge )
)
)
)
) BOARD OF PATENT
MICHAEL R. FLEMING ) APPEALS
Administrative Patent Judge ) AND
) INTERFERENCES
6
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007