Appeal No. 97-1273
Application No. 08/269,818
controls to discrete manipulatory control signals, for
combining the discrete manipulatory control signals with voice
input signals to form command signals and for transferring the
command signals to the multimedia data processing device for
selecting, annotating and processing transiently displayed
images in said memory storage.
The examiner relies on the following reference:
Glick et al. (Glick) 5,283,819 Feb. 1, 1994
Claims 2-5 and 8-16 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. §
103. As evidence of obviousness the examiner offers Glick
taken alone. Rather than repeat the arguments of
appellants or the examiner, we make reference to the brief and
the answer for the respective details thereof.
OPINION
We have carefully considered the subject matter on
appeal, the rejection advanced by the examiner and the
evidence of obviousness relied upon by the examiner as support
for the rejection. We have, likewise, reviewed and taken into
consideration, in reaching our decision, the appellants’
arguments set forth in the brief along with the examiner’s
rationale in support of the rejection and arguments in
rebuttal set forth in the examiner’s answer.
3
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007