Appeal No. 97-1393
Application 08/456,349
claims 2 through 8 and 10 through 19 under 35 U.S.C. § 103 are
likewise not sustained.
It follows from the foregoing that the decision of
the examiner is reversed.
In reaching the above decision with regard to the
rejections posited by the examiner, we have construed the
language of the claims on appeal in light of appellant’s
underlying disclosure, and, in that regard, generally under-
stand the “substantially one dimensional upper arm” and the
“substantially one dimensional lower arm” as recited in
appellant’s claims to be arms that are each formed as a single
member (e.g., the rectangular section metal tubes seen in
Figure 1) wherein the length dimension of a member is signifi-
cantly greater than the height and width dimensions of the
member so that the members are each of narrow profile when
viewed from above or from the side so as to permit easy
grasping of the structure by a hunter when the arms are folded
together for
7
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007