Appeal No. 1997-1413
Application 07/765,757
information from Ishii’s keyboard in Figure 23 only goes to
the display and not to the film is untenable. All the
embodiments of Ishii are directed to the manually entered
input data and/or the data representative of the object to be
photographed being stored in memory such as memory 105 before
it is transferred to the film for printing. It also makes no
sense that the entered caption such as shown in Figure 23
would not appear on the exposed film since the whole purpose
of Ishii’s device is to expose additional information onto the
photographic film with the object to be photographed.
Appellant’s argument that Ishii relates to pattern
recognition rather than a user drawn sketch is not persuasive.
Ishii suggests that any information can be entered for
exposure on the film, and the suggestion of a writing pad, as
discussed above, would also have suggested the capability of
entering sketches as taught by Johnston. Therefore, we
sustain this rejection of independent claim 1. Dependent
claims 6, 17 and 40
fall with claim 1 because appellant has not presented
arguments sufficient to have these claims considered
13
Page: Previous 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007