THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not written for publication in a law journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board. Paper No. 22 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE ____________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES ____________ Ex parte BARBARA ROSS BERLIN and DAVID W. BERLIN ____________ Appeal No. 1997-1436 Application No. 08/419,1741 ____________ ON BRIEF2 ____________ Before CALVERT, MEISTER, and NASE, Administrative Patent Judges. NASE, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL This is a decision on appeal from the examiner's final rejection of claims 13 and 14, which are all of the claims pending in this application.3 1Application for patent filed April 10, 1995. 2On June 1, 1999, the appellants filed a request (Paper No. 21) to cancel the oral hearing scheduled for June 7, 1999. Such request has been granted. 3Claims 13 and 14 were amended subsequent to the final rejection. While the examiner has approved entry of the (continued...)Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007