Appeal No. 97-1445 Page 3
Application No. 08/202,254
BACKGROUND
The appellant's invention relates to a wall corner
composite comprising at least one curvilinear masonry building
unit. An understanding of the invention can be derived from a
reading of exemplary claim 19, which appears in the appendix
to the appellant's brief.
The prior art references of record relied upon by the
examiner in rejecting the appealed claims are:
Kaplan 4,041,670 Aug. 16, 1977
Rinninger 4,572,699 Feb. 25, 1986
Gillet 4,769,961 Sep. 13, 1988
The following rejections are before us for review.
Claims 7, 16, 18 and 19 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C.
§ 102(b) as being anticipated by Kaplan.
Claims 8 through 10, 12 and 20 through 28 stand rejected
under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being unpatentable over Kaplan.
Claim 17 stands rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being
unpatentable over Kaplan in view of Gillet.
Claims 46 through 56 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103
as being unpatentable over Kaplan in view of Rinninger.
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007