THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered
today (1) was not written for publication in a law
journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 30
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
________________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
________________
Ex parte WEI-SHIN HOU
________________
Appeal No. 1997-1515
Application 08/361,8911
________________
ON BRIEF
________________
Before WILLIAM F. SMITH, JOHN D. SMITH and OWENS,
Administrative Patent Judges.
OWENS, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is an appeal from the examiner’s final rejection of
claims 30-40, 42-44 and 49. Claims 1-27, which are the only
1Application for patent filed December 21, 1994.
According to appellant, the Application is a continuation of
Application 08/050,840, filed April 21, 1993, now abandoned.
-1-1
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007