Appeal No. 97-1583
Application No. 08/340,785
non-integer. Thus, the 35 U.S.C. § 102(b) rejection of claims
1, 2, 8, 9 and 14 through 16 is reversed.
The 35 U.S.C. § 103 rejection of claims 3, 4, 7, 10, 11,
17 and 20 is reversed because Ochi neither teaches nor would
have suggested to one of ordinary skill in the art “M/N being
an integer.”
DECISION
The decision of the examiner rejecting claims 1, 2, 8, 9
and 14 through 16 under 35 U.S.C. § 102(b), and claims 3, 4,
7, 10, 11, 17 and 20 under 35 U.S.C. § 103 is reversed.
REVERSED
KENNETH W. HAIRSTON )
Administrative Patent Judge )
)
)
) BOARD OF PATENT
JAMES T. CARMICHAEL ) APPEALS AND
Administrative Patent Judge ) INTERFERENCES
)
)
)
LANCE LEONARD BARRY )
Administrative Patent Judge )
6
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007