Appeal No. 1997-1604
Application No. 08/273,688
nor the corresponding rejections of claims 15 through 18 over
Mallya alone.
Finally, the Section 103 rejection of claim 17 over
Krijnen also cannot be sustained. This reference, like
Mallya, contains no teaching or suggestion of the specific
method defined by appealed claim 17 including step b thereof.
The decision of the examiner is affirmed-in-part.
9
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007