THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not written
for publication in a law journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 17
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte DANIEL G. STEARNS,
STEPHEN P. VERNON,
NATALE M. CEGLIO,
and ANDREW W. HAWRYLUK
____________
Appeal No. 97-1627
Application No. 08/202,9911
____________
ON BRIEF
____________
Before THOMAS, BARRETT, and BARRY, Administrative Patent Judges.
BARRY, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on the appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134
from the final rejection of claims 1-19. We reverse.
BACKGROUND
1The application, entitled “Giant Magnetoresistive
Sensor,” was filed February 28, 1994.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007