Appeal No. 97-1647 Page 3 Application No. 08/321,255 flexure arm to achieve a desired flexure arm bend and thereby a desired fly height. The references relied on by the patent examiner in rejecting the claims follow: Fechner 4,812,927 Mar. 14, 1989 Harms et al. (Harms) 4,816,743 Mar. 28, 1989 Owe et al. (Owe) 5,012,369 Apr. 30, 1991 Murata et al. (Murata) 5,341,256 Aug. 23, 1994 Buettner et al. (Buettner) 5,412,519 May 2, 1995. (filed Aug. 26, 1993) Claim 1 stands rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as obvious over Owe in view of Murata. Claims 2 and 3 stand rejected under § 103 as obvious over Owe in view of Murata further in view of Buettner. Claims 4-7, 9, 10, and 12 stand rejected under § 103 as obvious over Owe in view of Murata further in view of Fechner. Claims 8 and 13-21 stand rejected under § 103 as obvious over Owe in view of Murata further in view ofPage: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007