THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not written
for publication in a law journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 14
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte SEIJI MATSUMOTO
____________
Appeal No. 97-1656
Application No. 08/314,2561
____________
ON BRIEF
____________
Before URYNOWICZ, HAIRSTON and BARRY, Administrative Patent
Judges.
BARRY, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on the appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134
from the final rejection of claims 1 through 6. We affirm-in-
part.
1The application was filed September 30, 1994 and
entitled “Single Chip Microcomputer having a Built-in On
Screen Display Device.”
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007