Ex parte SCHWERDT et al. - Page 2




              Appeal No. 1997-1722                                                                                            
              Application No. 08/385,256                                                                                      


                      The examiner relies upon the following references as evidence of obviousness:                           
                      Somerville            2,909,204             Oct. 20, 1959                                               
                      Troyer                3,054,305             Sep.18, 1962                                                
                      McGuire               4,182,138             Jan. 08, 1980                                               
                      Ferguson              4,849,047             Jul. 18, 1989                                               
                      Thiry          GB 461,478                   Feb. 17, 1937                                               
                      (British Patent)                                                                                        
                      Appellants' claimed invention is directed to a process for making a pressed-in                          
              torsional vibration damper which comprises adhesively bonding an elastomeric spacer                             
              ring into the annular gap between a metal hub ring and a metal flywheel ring.  The adhesive                     
              utilized is initially non-adhesive and is cured or activated "without heating it to a                           
              temperature greater than 90° C."  The adhesive is selected from the group recited in claim                      
              1.  Because of the strength of the adhesive bond, "it is possible to compress the                               
              elastomeric spacer ring in the radial direction by as little as 20% down to essentially 0% . .                  
              . [which] reduces or eliminates the risk of resonance occurring during use of the torsional                     
              vibration damper."  (page 4 of brief).                                                                          
                      Appealed claims 1, 3, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 14-21 and 23 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C.                      
              § 103 as being unpatentable over Thiry in view of McGuire and Somerville.  Also, claims 1,                      
              3, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12 and 14-23 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being unpatentable                         
              over either Troyer or McGuire in view of Ferguson and Somerville.                                               




                                                              2                                                               





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007