THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not written for publication in a law
journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 38
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
_____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
_____________
Ex parte GARY K. MICHELSON
_____________
Appeal No. 97-1782
Application 08/112,4261
______________
ON BRIEF
_______________
Before CALVERT, MEISTER and NASE, Administrative Patent Judges.
CALVERT, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is an appeal from the final rejection of claims 1 to 8 and 13 to 15, all the claims remaining
in the application.2
1Application for patent filed August 26, 1993. According to appellant, this application is a
continuation of Application 07/692,583, filed May 13, 1991, now abandoned; which is a continuation
of Application 07/341,848, filed April 24, 1989, now abandoned.
2The examiner states in the answer that claims 14 and 15 were inadvertently omitted from the
final rejection. It does not appear that appellant has been prejudiced by this omission.
1
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007