Ex parte VENHAM et al. - Page 2


                     Appeal No. 1997-1790                                                                                                                                              
                     Application 08/171,550                                                                                                                                            


                     wherein R  and R  may be the same or different and represent optionally substituted hydrocarbon1         2                                                                                                                                        
                     radicals, or R  and R  together with the â-carbon atom form a cycloaliphatic or heterocyclic ring.1          2                                                                                                                                   
                                The appealed claims as represented by claim 13  are drawn to an aldimine based on the2                                                                                  
                     reaction product of diamino dicyclohexyl methane with an aldehyde corresponding to the formula                                                                    
                     specified in the claim.  Claim 15, dependent on claim 13, specifies that the aldehyde comprises                                                                   
                     isobutyraldehyde.  The claimed aldimines are used in the coating compositions of claims 1 through 12 of                                                           
                     record.                                                                                                                                                           
                                The reference relied on by the examiner is                                                                                                             
                     Mormile et al. (Mormile)                                         5,214,086                                  May 25, 1993                                          
                                The examiner has rejected appealed claims 13 through 15 under 35 U.S.C. § 102(e) as being                                                              
                     anticipated by Mormile.  We affirm.                                                                                                                               
                                Rather than reiterate the respective positions advanced by the examiner and appellants, we                                                             
                     refer to the examiner’s answer and supplemental answer and to appellants’ principal and reply briefs for                                                          
                     a complete exposition thereof.                                                                                                                                    
                                                                                     Opinion                                                                                           
                                The dispositive issue in this appeal is whether the disclosure in Mormile of the preparation of                                                        
                     Aldimine #1 from and bis-(2-methyl-4-aminocyclohexyl)-methane  (col. 7) coupled with the disclosure3                                                                  
                     of the use of isobutyraldehyde in the preparation of Aldimines #1, #2 (col. 7) and #3 (col. 8) and other                                                          
                     aldimines (col. 5, line 25), and the disclosure that bis-(2-methyl-4-aminocyclohexyl)-methane and bis-                                                            
                     (4-aminocyclohexyl)-methane, as well as three other alkyl substituted bis-(4-aminocyclohexyl)-                                                                    
                     methanes (col. 4, lines 30-40 and 53-68, and col. 5, lines 2-8), are useful in the preparation of                                                                 



                     2Appellants state in their principal brief (page 2) that separate argument is presented for claims 13 and                                                         
                     14 and for claim 15. Thus, we decide this appeal based on appealed claims 13 and 15.     37 CFR §                                                                 
                     1.192(c)(7) (1995).                                                                                                                                               
                     3The compounds represented by the term “diamino dicyclohexyl methane” in claim 13 are also named                                                                  
                     bis-(aminocyclohexyl)-methane as in appellants’ specification as well as methylene biscyclohexanamine                                                             
                     as in Mormile. The compound bis-(2-methyl-4-aminocyclohexyl)-methane is the dimethyl isomer of                                                                    
                     bis-(aminocyclohexyl)-methane, and is named 4,4½-methylenebis(2 methyl)cyclohexanamine in                                                                         
                     Mormile (col. 7, lines 27).                                                                                                                                       
                                                                                        - 2 -                                                                                          




Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007