THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today
(1) was not written for publication in a law journal and
(2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 16
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte TOSHIYUKI KAERIYAMA
____________
Appeal No. 1997-2285
Application 08/311,4801
____________
ON BRIEF
____________
Before URYNOWICZ, HAIRSTON, and BARRY, Administrative Patent
Judges.
HAIRSTON, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is an appeal from the final rejection of claims 1
through 7.
The disclosed invention relates to a method of
manufacturing a micromechanical device.
Application for patent filed September 23, 1994.1
1
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007