THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered
today (1) was not written for publication in a law
journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the
Board.
Paper No. 23
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte HUI HU and ARMIN H. PFOH
____________
Appeal No. 97/2300
Application No. 08/282,6711
____________
ON BRIEF
____________
Before HAIRSTON, KRASS, and HECKER, Administrative Patent
Judges.
HAIRSTON, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is an appeal from the final rejection of claims 1
and 2. Claim 3 is objected to as being dependent upon a
rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in
1Application for patent filed July 29, 1994.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007