Ex parte HU et al. - Page 1




                                    THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION                                                                        

                          The opinion in support of the decision being entered                                                                          
                          today (1) was not written for publication in a law                                                                            
                          journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the                                                                               
                          Board.                                                                                                                        
                                                                                                                Paper No. 23                            
                                       UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                                                        
                                                                 ____________                                                                           
                                             BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                                                         
                                                            AND INTERFERENCES                                                                           
                                                                 ____________                                                                           
                                              Ex parte HUI HU and ARMIN H. PFOH                                                                         
                                                                 ____________                                                                           
                                                           Appeal No. 97/2300                                                                           
                                                    Application No. 08/282,6711                                                                         
                                                                 ____________                                                                           
                                                                    ON BRIEF                                                                            
                                                                 ____________                                                                           
                 Before HAIRSTON, KRASS, and HECKER, Administrative Patent                                                                              
                 Judges.                                                                                                                                
                 HAIRSTON, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                                                                 




                                                           DECISION ON APPEAL                                                                           


                          This is an appeal from the final rejection of claims 1                                                                        
                 and 2.  Claim 3 is objected to as being dependent upon a                                                                               
                 rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in                                                                            

                          1Application for patent filed July 29, 1994.                                                                                  





Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007