THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1)
was not written for publication in a law journal and (2) is
not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 17
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
__________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
__________
Ex parte MAHENDRA K. SHARMA
__________
Appeal No. 1997-2376
Application 08/199,8631
___________
ON BRIEF
___________
Before PAK, OWENS and WALTZ, Administrative Patent Judges.
OWENS, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is an appeal from the examiner’s refusal to allow
1Application for patent filed February 22, 1994.
According to the appellant, the application is a division of
Application 07/956,532, filed October 5, 1992, now U.S. Patent
No. 5,300,256, issued April 5, 1994; which is a division of
Application 07/513,389, filed April 23, 1990, now U.S. Patent
No. 5,153,029, issued October 6, 1992; which is a
continuation-in-part of Application 07/392,759, filed August
11, 1989, now U.S. Patent No. 5,204,022, issued April 20,
1993.
1
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007