Appeal No. 97-2412
Application No. 08/330,136
Appellant’s invention pertains to a transmission. An
understanding of the invention can be derived from a reading
of exemplary claim 1, a copy of which appears in the APPENDIX
to the brief (Paper No. 14).
As evidence of anticipation, the examiner has applied the
following:
"Admitted Prior Art, i.e., Figs. 1 and 2 in this application
shown in NISSAN AUTOMATIC TRANSAXLE RL4F03A - MAINTENANCE
PROCEDURE MANUAL, May 1989" (Nissan Manual).
The following rejection is before us for review.
Claims 1 through 4 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. §
102(b) as being anticipated by the NISSAN MANUAL (Figs. 1 and
2 of present application).
The full text of the examiner's rejection and response to
the argument presented by appellant appears in the answer
(Paper No. 15), while the complete statement of appellant’s
argument can be found in the brief (Paper No. 14).
3
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007