Appeal No. 97-2457 Page 8 Application No. 08/366,376 these reasons, we cannot agree that the combination of Spindt, van der Wilk, and Kuroda would have suggested that subject matter of claim 1 or its dependent claims 2, 4, 10, 13, 14, 16-18, and 20-22 or that the combination of Spindt, van der Wilk, Kuroda, and Nomura would have suggested that subject matter of claim 1 or its dependent claims 6 and 8.Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007