Ex parte YURA et al. - Page 8




          Appeal No. 97-2457                                         Page 8           
          Application No. 08/366,376                                                  


          these reasons, we cannot agree that the combination of Spindt,              
          van der Wilk, and Kuroda would have suggested that subject                  
          matter of claim 1 or its dependent claims 2, 4, 10, 13, 14,                 
          16-18, and 20-22 or that the combination of Spindt, van der                 
          Wilk, Kuroda, and Nomura would have suggested that subject                  
          matter of claim 1 or its dependent claims 6 and 8.                          

































Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007