Ex parte SPERRY et al. - Page 4




                     Appeal No. 97-2491                                                                                                                                                
                     Application 08/514,010                                                                                                                                            


                                The opposing viewpoints of appellants are set forth in the brief (Paper No. 13).  In addition,                                                         

                     appellants rely on evidence of nonobviousness in the form of a declaration by Abraham N. Reichental                                                               

                     and videotape exhibits to show commercial success of the claimed invention demonstrated by a                                                                      
                     competitor’s copying.   A copy of the Reichental declaration is appended to this opinion.5                                                                                                                                  

                                In arguing the patentability of claims 33, 34, 40 and 41 as a group (brief, page 5), appellants do                                                     

                     not dispute the examiner’s implied position that the modified Sperry device would result in the claimed                                                           

                     subject matter.  Instead, appellants challenge the examiner’s foundation position that it would have been                                                         

                     obvious to modify Sperry in the manner proposed in view of Willden’s teachings.  In this regard,                                                                  

                     appellants note on pages 6-7 of the brief that there are several ways of forming foam-filled cushions for                                                         

                     packaging cushions, including (1) a technique that includes a device for first forming the bags from a                                                            

                     tube of plastic material, (2) a method like that of Sperry where bags are formed from two separate                                                                

                     sheets of plastic material that are joined longitudinally and transversely to produce single bags, and (3)                                                        

                     an approach such as that of the                                                                                                                                   



                     appealed claims where a single center-folded sheet of plastic material is used to form bags by sealing                                                            

                                5The evidence of nonobviousness was originally submitted by appellants in parent application                                                           
                     SN 08/121,751, and was incorporated by reference into the present application for the first time by                                                               
                     reference thereto in the unentered amendment filed subsequent to the final rejection.  Although said                                                              
                     amendment was not entered, the examiner nevertheless indicated that the evidence has been considered                                                              
                     (answer, pages 7-8).  In view of the late stage of prosecution at which this evidence came before the                                                             
                     examiner in this case, it would appear that the examiner was not obligated to consider it in the answer.                                                          
                                                                                          4                                                                                            





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007