THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not written for
publication in a law journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 21
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
_____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
_____________
Ex parte HIDEAKI KASHIHARA,
KATSUYA YAMAGUCHI, and KOJI HATTA
_____________
Appeal No. 97-2523
Application 08/337,8231
_____________
Rehearing
_____________
Before SCHAFER, LEE and TORCZON, Administrative Patent Judges.
LEE, Administrative Patent Judge.
ON REQUEST FOR REHEARING
A decision on appeal from the examiner’s rejection of
claims 7-9 and 11-15 was mailed on August 4, 1999, in which we
reversed the rejection of claims 7-9 and 11-15. (Paper No.
19).
The appellants filed a request for rehearing (Paper No.
20), focusing on the following statement appearing in our
decision:
Application for patent filed November 8, 1994.1
1
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007