THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not written for publication in a law
journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 33
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
_____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
_____________
Ex parte MARTEN BURGDORF
and DIETMAR PRZYTULLA
_____________
Appeal No. 97-2535
Application 08/129,1081
______________
HEARD: APRIL 7, 1999
_______________
Before McCANDLISH, Senior Administrative Patent Judge, COHEN and MEISTER, Administrative
Patent Judges.
McCANDLISH, Senior Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on an appeal from the examiner's final rejection of claims 9, 10 and 14
through 24. The only other claims still pending in the application have been withdrawn from
consideration as being directed to a non-elected invention.
1Application for patent filed November 18, 1993. According to appellants, this application is a 371 of
PCT/EP93/00284, filed February 6, 1993.
1
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007