Ex parte KUMAGAI - Page 2




                 Appeal No. 97-2611                                                                                                                     
                 Application 08/299,101                                                                                                                 






                                                           DECISION ON APPEAL                                                                           
                                   This is an appeal from the final rejection of claims                                                                 
                 1 to 4, 6, 10 and 11, all the claims remaining in the applica-                                                                         
                 tion.                                                                                                                                  
                                   The appealed claims are drawn to a ground terminal,                                                                  
                 and are reproduced in the appendix of appellant's brief.                                                                               
                                   The references applied in the final rejection are:                                                                   
                 Hosking                         2,179,575        Nov.  14,                                                                             
                 1939                                                                                                                                   
                 Mroz                            2,778,399        Jan.  22,                                                                             
                 1957                                                                                                                                   
                 Spencer et al. (Spencer)        4,470,649        Sept. 11,                                                                             
                 1984                                                                                                                                   
                 Appellant's Figures 1 to 4                                                                                                             
                                   Claims 1 to 4, 6, 10 and 11 stand finally rejected                                                                   
                 under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as unpatentable over the admitted                                                                             
                 prior art, as shown in appellant's Figures 1 to 4,  in view of                            2                                            
                 either Mroz or Hosking, together with Spencer.                                                                                         


                          2Pursuant to the Manual of Patent Examining Procedure                                                                         
                 § 608.02(g), appellant should designate Figs. 1 to 4 by                                                                                
                 the legend "Prior Art."                                                                                                                
                                                                           2                                                                            





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007