THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered
today (1) was not written for publication in a law
journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the
Board.
Paper No. 12
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte FRANCIS J. O’BRIEN Jr.
____________
Appeal No. 97-2757
Application No. 08/412,2601
____________
ON BRIEF
____________
Before URYNOWICZ, HAIRSTON and BARRETT, Administrative Patent
Judges.
HAIRSTON, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is an appeal from the final rejection of claims 1, 7
and 10. In an Amendment After Final (paper number 7), claim
10 was amended. As a result of the amendment, the examiner
withdrew the indefiniteness rejection of claim 10 (paper
number 8). Thus, claims 1 and 7 remain before us on appeal,
1Application for patent filed March 28, 1995.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007