Ex parte BODIN et al. - Page 1




                                    THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION                                                                        

                   The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not written                                                       
                   for publication in a law journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.                                                      
                                                                                                                  Paper No. 47                          
                                        UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                                                       
                                                                  ____________                                                                          
                                              BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                                                        
                                                             AND INTERFERENCES                                                                          
                                                                  ____________                                                                          
                                      Ex parte ROLAND S. BODIN and GEORG CHAMBERT                                                                       
                                                                  ____________                                                                          
                                                            Appeal No. 97-2758                                                                          
                                                     Application No. 07/859,9621                                                                        
                                                                  ____________                                                                          
                                                           HEARD: March 9, 1999                                                                         
                                                                  ____________                                                                          
                 Before KRASS, BARRETT, and FRAHM, Administrative Patent Judges.                                                                        
                 KRASS, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                                                                    




                                                            DECISION ON APPEAL                                                                          
                          This is a decision on appeal from the final rejection of                                                                      
                 claim 18, the only claim remaining in the application.                                                                                 
                          The invention pertains to cellular telephone systems.                                                                         
                 More particularly, the invention allows a mobile station to                                                                            
                 operate at an extended distance from the base station,                                                                                 

                          1Application for patent filed March 30, 1992.                                                                                 





Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007