Ex parte SCHORNACK et al. - Page 3




          Appeal No. 97-2762                                                          
          Application No. 08/309,845                                                  


               (a)  connecting at least one land-line, telephonic                     
          communication device to at least a portion of the land-line,                
          interior-premises, telephone wiring located at the premises                 
          where the land-line, telephonic communication device is to be               
          used for making a call over the radio system;                               
               (b)  coupling said at least a portion of the land-line,                
          interior-premises, telephone wiring located at the premises to              
          a radio transceiver which is part of a radio system; and                    
               (c) said step (b) comprising coupling said at least a                  
          portion of the land-line, interior-premises, telephone wiring               
          located at the premises to a radio interface that is coupled                
          to said radio transceiver.                                                  
               The reference relied on by the examiner is:                            
          Shitara et al. (Shitara)      4,833,702                     May             
          23, 1989                                                                    
               Claims 12 through 17, 20, 22, 29 through 34, 37 and 46                 
          through 57 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 102(b) as being                 
          anticipated by Shitara.                                                     
               Claims 18, 19, 21, 23 through 28, 35, 36, 38 through 45                
          and 58 through 61 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as                   
          being unpatentable over Shitara.                                            
               Reference is made to the briefs and the answers for the                
          respective positions of the appellants and the examiner.                    
                                       OPINION                                        



                                          3                                           





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007