Appeal No. 1997-2910
Application 08/421,387
In reviewing all three references, we fail to find
that any of the references suggests that their radiator would
be superior as a single piece or individual pieces.
Therefore, we
fail to find any support in the references to show that
Depew's single piece radiator is superior to individual vanes
as taught by Zelinka or Rinia. Therefore, we fail to find
that the art suggests the desirability of the Examiner's
modification of Depew's radiator.
We have not sustained the rejection of claims 1, 3,
4, 6 and 7 under 35 U.S.C. § 103. Accordingly, the Examiner's
decision is reversed.
REVERSED
ERROL A. KRASS )
Administrative Patent Judge )
)
)
9
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007