Ex Parte WADMAN et al - Page 10




          Appeal No. 97-3669                                                           
          Application 08/391,745                                                       

                                     CONCLUSION                                       
               The rejection of claims 24, 25, and 28 under 35 U.S.C.                  
          § 102(b) as being anticipated by Aoyama is affirmed.                         
               The rejection of claims 4, 5, 8, and 27 under 35 U.S.C.                 
          § 102(b) as being anticipated by Aoyama is reversed.                         
               The rejection of claim 26 under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being                
          unpatentable over Aoyama and Kleiman is affirmed.                            
               The rejection of claims 6, 13, and 14 under 35 U.S.C. § 103             
          as being unpatentable over Aoyama and Kleiman is reversed.                   
               The rejection of claim 11 under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being                
          unpatentable over Aoyama, Cornet, and Kleiman is reversed.                   
               The rejection of claim 12 under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being                
          unpatentable over Aoyama, Cornet, Won, and Kleiman is reversed.              
               The rejection of claims 2 and 9 under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as                
          being unpatentable over Aoyama and Cornet is reversed.                       
               The rejection of claim 22 under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being                
          unpatentable over Aoyama and Cornet is affirmed.                             
               The rejection of claims 3 and 10 under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as               
          being unpatentable over Aoyama, Cornet, and Won is reversed.                 













Page:  Previous  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007