Appeal No. 1997-3706 Application 08/406,108 order to perform the method recited in claim 1 one would have to lengthen the strap 23 of Taylor, insert the top (handle) end 14 of the umbrella into loop 24, and then carry the umbrella by strap 23. We do not consider that these modifications of Taylor would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill as “a mere choice between known arrangements” because Taylor does not disclose that the umbrella is carried by strap 23 and, as shown in Fig. 6, Taylor's umbrella is2 already provided with a carrying strap, namely, line 20 in housing 22. There would therefore be no motivation or suggestion for one of ordinary skill to modify Taylor's strap 23 to provide yet a second carrying strap in addition to the strap (20) already provided, it being noted that Torres and Foo each disclose the use of only a single carrying strap. Rejection (2) With regard to this rejection, the examiner states: As seen in figure 6, Saari et al discloses a rubber shoulder strap with closed apertures (78 or 92) for holding elongated articles. The device does not specifically disclose holding an umbrella, however, As disclosed in col. 4, lines 19 to 42, device 23 is called a2 “support strap web,” and is used to carry a jacket 28 in cavity 27. 4Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007