THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not written for publication in a law journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board. Paper No. 13 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE _____________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES _____________ Ex parte CHARLES A. CASWELL _____________ Appeal No. 97-3824 Application 29/042,7281 ______________ ON BRIEF _______________ Before McQUADE, MARTIN, and WARREN, Administrative Patent Judges. MARTIN, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL This is an appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the examiner's rejection of appellant's design claim under 35 U.S.C. § 103. We reverse. 1Application for design patent filed August 3, 1995.Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007