THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not written for
publication in a law journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 14
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
_____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
_____________
Ex parte DONALD R. HUENE
_____________
Appeal No. 1997-3989
Application No. 08/424,0671
______________
HEARD: September 14, 1999
_______________
Before PATE, STAAB and CRAWFORD, Administrative Patent Judges.
PATE, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is an appeal from the final rejection of claims 25 through 32. These are the
only claims remaining in the application.
1 Application for patent filed April 19, 1995. According to appellant, this application is a divisional
of application no. 08/203,764, filed March 1, 1994, which is a continuation of application no. 07/875,262,
filed April 28, 1992, both now abandoned.
1
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007