Ex parte VENKATESWAR et al. - Page 3




                 Appeal No. 1997-4025                                                                                                                   
                 Application 08/340,958                                                                                                                 


                          d.       controlling the electrophotographic development of                                                                   
                 said latent image such that said minimum exposure level is                                                                             
                 eliminated from a final printed image from said latent image.                                                                          


                                                               THE REFERENCES                                                                           
                 Yoshida                           4,259,662      Mar. 31, 1981                                                                         
                 Tokuhara                          4,560,999      Dec. 24,                                                                              
                 1985                                                                                                                                   
                 Noguchi                           4,995,703      Feb. 26, 1991                                                                         
                 Mochizuki et al. (Mochizuki)      5,247,375      Sep. 21, 1993                                                                         
                 Henley                            5,406,213      Apr. 11, 1995                                                                         
                 (filed Sep. 10,                                                                                                                        
                 1991)                                                                                                                                  
                 Florence et al. (Florence)        5,461,411      Oct. 24, 1995                                                                         
                 (filed Mar. 29,                                                                                                                        
                 1993)                                                                                                                                  
                                                                                                                                                       
                 Endo et al. (Endo)                 5-236358      Sep. 10, 19932                                                                                                     
                          (Japanese Kokai)                                                                                                              
                                                               THE REJECTIONS                                                                           
                          Claim 1 stands rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 over                                                                            
                 Tokuhara in view of Henley, Mochizuki, Endo, Yoshida and                                                                               
                 Florence, and also over Tokuhara in view of Henley, Noguchi,                                                                           
                 Endo, Yoshida and Florence.3                                                                                                           

                          2Our consideration of this reference is based upon an                                                                         
                 English translation thereof, which is of record.                                                                                       
                          3An provisional obviousness-type double patenting                                                                             
                 rejection over claim 4 of copending Application 08/766,657 is                                                                          
                                                                         -3-3                                                                           





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007