Appeal No. 1997-4087 Page 5
Application No. 08/298,375
Regarding claims 7, 8, 9, and 10, he makes the following,
similar argument. "Nor does either reference disclose causing
portions of the adhesive to flow into the openings in the
orifice plate and body portion, and increasing the total
contact area of the adhesive material with both the orifice
plate and the body portion." (Id. at 19.)
Regarding claims 13-17, the appellant makes the following,
similar argument.
Myers does not disclose a structure wherein two
adhesively intersecured elements have adhesive
receiving openings formed in each of them, wherein
... adhesive material extends into the adhesive
receiving openings in both of the two elements.
Additionally, no combination of the art discussed on
pages 1-2 of the present specification and the Myers
reference disclosure meets these limitations. (Id.
at 8.)
Regarding claims 18 and 19, the appellant makes the following,
similar argument. "Nor does either reference disclose causing
portions of the adhesive to flow into the openings in the
orifice plate and body portion, and increasing the total
contact area of the adhesive material with both the orifice
plate and the body portion." (Id. at 23-24.)
The examiner’s reply follows.
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007