Appeal No. 1997-4175
Application No. 07/805,703
6, is at column 2, lines 19-20: “The hole 6 is provided for
evacuating or filling the discharge area 11.”
In our view, the examiner has not established the
requisite prima facie case of obviousness for a proper
rejection under 35 U.S.C. § 103. Accordingly, the examiner’s
decision is reversed.
REVERSED
ERROL A. KRASS )
Administrative Patent Judge )
)
)
)
) BOARD OF PATENT
JERRY SMITH ) APPEALS
Administrative Patent Judge ) AND
) INTERFERENCES
)
)
)
PARSHOTAM S. LALL )
Administrative Patent Judge )
6
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007