Appeal No. 1997-4213 Application No. 08/359,407 also is concerned about the problem of inadvertent disengagement of the hanger from the edge portion of the display (column 3, lines 11-17). This is prevented by providing a portion (30) of the front face of the clip that extends upwardly immediately above the upper edge of the aperture through which it extends “to resist upward-acting forces exerted upon it without being dislodged from mounting aperture 46" (column 4, lines 25-32; Figure 2). Insofar as the requirements of claim 1 are concerned, O’Brien fails to disclose or teach an integrally molded tooth projecting from the clip to resist removal of the clip from the support edge. Brozak is directed to a display system in which a metal support arm is mounted on a U-shaped metal clip that is positioned downwardly upon a metal mounting bar. As best shown in Figure 3, the clip is provided with an inwardly oriented projection (33) which, after the clip is installed on the bar, is located beneath the lower edge of the bar and provides resistance to dislodgement of the clip from the bar. The subject of the Fearing reference is a clip for holding wires, pipes or the like in position along the edge of a support. Prongs are provided on the inside of the clip to 5Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007