THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today
(1) was not written for publication in a law journal and
(2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 17
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte THOMAS D. SCIUGA, SALVATORE J. SCIUGA
and KEITH J. TUPPER
____________
Appeal No. 97-4253
Application No. 08/385,9811
____________
ON BRIEF
____________
Before Abrams, Frankfort and CRAWFORD, Administrative Patent
Judges.
CRAWFORD, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on appeal from the examiner's final
rejection of claims 1 through 6, 9 and 10, which are all of
the claims pending in this application. Claims 7, 8 and 11
through 13 are allowed.
1Application for patent filed February 9, 1995.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007