Ex parte KIELPIKOWSKI - Page 3




          Appeal No. 1997-4264                                                        
          Application No. 08/421,131                                                  


          examiner in rejecting the appealed claims are:                              

          Burger                   3,663,962                     May  23,             
          1972                                                                        
          Van Vliet                4,297,157                     Oct. 27,             
          1981                                                                        
          Greene                   4,674,135                     Jun. 23,             
          1987                                                                        
          Lawson              4,695,278                          Sep. 22,             
          1987                                                                        
          Zafiroglu                4,773,238                Sep. 27,                  
          1988                                                                        
          (Zafiroglu '238)                                                            


          Zafiroglu                4,879,169                     Nov. 07,             
          1989                                                                        
          (Zafiroglu '169)                                                            
          Zafiroglu                     4,998,421                     Mar.            
          12, 1991                                                                    
          (Zafiroglu '421)                                                            
               As a preliminary matter, we note that on pages 2 and 3 of              
          the Office action mailed April 4, 1996 (Paper No. 15), the                  
          specification was objected to under 35 U.S.C. § 112, first                  
          paragraph, as failing to support the invention being claimed                
          and claims 1 through 16 and 21 through 24 were rejected under               
          35 U.S.C. § 112, first paragraph, for the reasons set forth in              
          the objection to the specification.  In the next Office action              
          (Paper No. 17), which was made final, the examiner again                    
          objected to the specification, but omitted the rejection of                 
                                          3                                           





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007