Ex parte MCFARLAND - Page 4




          Appeal No. 1997-4351                                       Page 4           
          Application No. 08/435,375                                                  


          indicating that the first window’s place is behind the second               
          window when both windows are in the first portion of the                    
          display.  Independent claim 6, the apparatus claim, indicates               
          that the windows are in a time-invariant order and that the                 
          returned window object is returned to its original position,                
          relative to other window objects, based on information in a                 
          data structure, said information being received by a processor.             


               The window display system of Bates cascades a plurality of             
          windows based on the amount of time a particular window has                 
          been active, with the most active window being on top (i.e.,                
          “in focus”) and the other windows being positioned behind the               
          top window, in descending order of time of activity.  Thus,                 
          rather than being time-invariant, the positions of the windows              
          in Bates are very much dependent on time.                                   


               It is the examiner’s position [answer-page 4] that a                   
          window will be returned to its original position “if the amount             
          of active time of all windows remain the same, or the different             
          [sic, difference] between the amount of active time is not                  
          enough to change the display order of the windows.”  Although               







Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007