Ex parte DYER - Page 2




                     Appeal No. 97-4455                                                                                                                                                
                     Application 08/616,605                                                                                                                                            


                                The appellant's invention is directed to an inflatable cushion for a vehicle passenger restraint                                                       

                     system (airbag).  The claims on appeal have been reproduced in an appendix to the Brief.                                                                          



                                                                           THE REFERENCES                                                                                              

                                The references relied upon by the examiner to support the final rejection are:                                                                         

                     Kalberer et al. (Kalberer)                                                 5,335,884                        Aug. 9, 1994                                          

                     Sakai ('191)                                                               6-239191              Aug. 30, 1994                                                    
                     (Japanese Patent)3                                                                                                                                                

                     Imai ('859)                                                                4-278859              Oct.   5, 1992                                                   
                     (Japanese Patent)3                                                                                                                                                




                                                                           THE REJECTIONS                                                                                              

                                Claims 3, 4 and 9 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being unpatentable over Kalberer                                                             

                     in view of Japanese ‘859.                                                                                                                                         

                                Claim 5 stands rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being unpatentable over Kalberer in view of                                                           

                     Japanese ‘859 and Japanese ‘191.                                                                                                                                  

                                The rejections are explained in the Paper No. 6 (the final rejection).                                                                                 

                     Answer.                                                                                                                                                           
                                3PTO translations of these references are enclosed.                                                                                                    
                                                                                          2                                                                                            





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007