THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not written
for publication in a law journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 22
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte KATSUMI KITANAKA
____________
Appeal No. 1998-0046
Application No. 08/357,3201
____________
HEARD: NOVEMBER 1, 1999
____________
Before COHEN, NASE, and BAHR, Administrative Patent Judges.
BAHR, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on appeal from the examiner's final
rejection of claims 1 through 6, 9 and 10, which are all of
the claims pending in this application.2
We REVERSE and enter new grounds of rejection pursuant to
37 CFR § 1.196(b).
Application for patent filed December 16, 1994.1
Claims 7 and 8 were canceled in Paper No. 10.2
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007