Appeal No. 98-0361 Application 08/394,725 of claims 1 through 24, all of the claims pending in the application. We reverse. The invention relates to "headwear of the type having a crown and an associated depending rim/bill and, more particularly, to a headwear piece with coordinated ornamentation on the crown and rim/bill that produces a unique visual effect" (specification, page 1). A copy of the appealed claims appears in the appendix to the appellant's main brief (Paper No. 13). The items relied upon by the examiner as evidence of obviousness are: Simon Des.188,029 May 24, 1960 Rife et al. (Rife) 5,111,366 May 5, 1992 Kellin et al. (Kellin) 5,136,726 Aug. 11, 1992 The item relied upon by the appellant as evidence of non- obviousness is: The 37 CFR § 1.132 Declaration of Robert Kronenberger filed November 27, 1995 (part of Paper No. 7) Claims 1 through 11 and 14 through 24 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being unpatentable over Kellin in view of Simon, and claims 12 and 13 stand rejected under 35 2Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007