Ex parte GRAY et al. - Page 14




          Appeal No. 98-0457                                                          
          Application 08/604,813                                                      


          parameter that can be varied within certain limits, and that                
          the overall acceptable moisture transmission rate for a                     
          package used to store and transmit semiconductor wafers is a                
          parameter that may vary depending, inter alia, on the amount                
          of time the semiconductor wafers are to be stored in the                    
          package, the moisture content of the surrounding atmosphere,                
          and the degree of sensitivity to damage from moisture of a                  
          particular semiconductor wafer.  That is, the moisture                      
          transmission rate of the packaging materials is result                      
          effective variable.  Generally, it is considered to have been               
          obvious to develop workable or even optimum ranges for such                 
          variables.  In re Aller, 220 F.2d 454, 456, 105 USPQ 233, 235               
          (CCPA 1955); In re Boesch, 617 F.2d 272, 276, 205 USPQ 215,                 
          219 (CCPA 1980).  As stated by the court in In re Woodruff,                 
          919 F.2d 1575, 1578, 16 USPQ2d 1934, 1936 (Fed. Cir. 1990):                 
               The law is replete with cases in which the                             
               difference between the claimed invention and the                       
               prior art is some range or other variable within the                   
               claims . . . .  These cases have consistently held                     
               that in such a situation, the applicant must show                      
               that the particular range is critical, generally by                    
               showing that the claimed range achieves unexpected                     
               results relative to the prior art range.  [Emphasis                    
               in original; citations omitted].                                       


                                        -14-                                          





Page:  Previous  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007