THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today
(1) was not written for publication in a law journal and
(2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 18
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte FRANCO GARIBOLDI
____________
Appeal No. 98-0494
Application No. 07/954,0561
____________
HEARD: May 5, 1998
____________
Before COHEN, FLEMING, and HANLON, Administrative Patent Judges.
HANLON, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is an appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the final
rejection of the following design claim:
The ornamental design for a panty hose article as shown
and described.
1 Application for patent filed September 28, 1992. According to
appellant, the application is a continuation-in part of Application
No. 07/403,569, filed September 6, 1989, now abandoned.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007