Appeal No. 98-0585
Application No. 08/638,526
The rejection is explained on pages 2 and 3 of the final
rejection. The arguments of the appellant and examiner in
support of their respective positions may be found of pages 4-
6 of the brief, pages 1 and 2 of the reply brief, and pages 4
and 5 of the answer.
OPINION
At the outset, we note that the appellant on page 4 of
the brief states that the rejected claims stand or fall
together. Accordingly, claims 1-4 will stand or fall with
representative claim 1. 37 CFR § 1.192(c)(7).
We have carefully reviewed the appellant's invention as
described in the specification, the appealed claims, the prior
art applied by the examiner and the respective positions
advanced by the appellant in the brief and the reply brief and
by the examiner in the answer. As a consequence of this
review, we will sustain the above-noted rejection.
With respect to representative claim 1 the final
rejection states that
Sakazume discloses all the features of the
applicant's invention such as a disk brake assembly
comprising a rotary disk 1, a caliper having side
3
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007