THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not written for
publication in a law journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 11
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
_____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
_____________
Ex parte RICHARD H. POHLE
_____________
Appeal No. 98-0609
Application 08/490,2031
______________
ON BRIEF
_______________
Before CALVERT, COHEN, and NASE, Administrative Patent Judges.
COHEN, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is an appeal from the final rejection of claims 1
through 8 and 10 through 16. These claims constitute all of
the claims remaining in the application.
Appellant’s invention pertains to a non-alpha-numeric
1 Application for patent filed June 14, 1995. According to appellant, the
application is a continuation-in-part of Application 08/027,886, filed March 8, 1993,
now abandoned.
1
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007