THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not written for publication in a law
journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 27
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
_____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
_____________
Ex parte KONRAD EIPPER,
WOLFGANG FUSSNEGGER,
and CHRISTOPH SCHLOTT
_____________
Appeal No. 1998-0682
Application 08/724,3061
______________
HEARD: DECEMBER 7, 1999
_______________
Before FRANKFORT, STAAB and GONZALES, Administrative Patent Judges.
FRANKFORT, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on appeal from the examiner's final rejection of claims 1, 4, 8 and 9, which
are all of the claims remaining in this application. Claims 2, 3, 5 through 7 have been canceled.
1Application for patent filed September 9, 1996. According to Appellants, this application is a
continuation of Application 08/316,443, filed October 3, 1994.
1
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007