Appeal No. 1998-0910 Application No. 08/454,596 (transfer tank). A blower 10 establishes a partial vacuum in the holding tank 8. When a user initiates a flushing operation, rinse water enters the bowl, the blower 10 is activated, and the discharge valve 6 is opened, whereby waste material and rinse water are rapidly drawn from the bowl 2 (column 6, lines 38 through 44). As an alternative for the blower 10, the patentee refers to an electrically driven vacuum pump (column 8, lines 1 through 5). Like the examiner, we fully appreciate that the applied references individually reveal many aspects of the system of appellant’s claim 1. However, setting aside in our minds the teaching of the present application, when we collectively consider the evidence of obviousness as a whole, it is at once apparent to us that the applied patents themselves simply would not have suggested the proposed selective modifications of the Burns apparatus to yield the above-ground sewage treatment removal system as set forth in claim 1. In effect, a major overhaul and reworking of the apparatus of Burns would be required and, as we see it, only impermissible guidance from appellant’s own disclosure, and not the evidence of 12Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007