Ex parte BUCHER - Page 1




                                            THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION                                                                                               
                     The opinion in support of the decision being entered today                                                                                                        
                     (1) was not written for publication in a law journal and                                                                                                          
                     (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.                                                                                                                        
                                                                                                                      Paper No. 27                                                     

                                               UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                                                                               
                                                                                __________                                                                                             
                                                      BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                                                                               
                                                                         AND INTERFERENCES                                                                                             
                                                                                __________                                                                                             
                                                                    Ex parte PETER BUCHER                                                                                              
                                                                                __________                                                                                             
                                                                        Appeal No. 98-0952                                                                                             
                                                                   Application 08/399,4341                                                                                             
                                                                                __________                                                                                             
                                                                        HEARD: May 5, 1999                                                                                             
                                                                                __________                                                                                             

                     Before CALVERT, Administrative Patent Judge, McCANDLISH,                                                                                                          
                     Senior Administrative Patent Judge, and ABRAMS, Administrative                                                                                                    
                     Patent Judge.                                                                                                                                                     
                     McCANDLISH, Senior Administrative Patent Judge.                                                                                                                   
                                                                        DECISION ON APPEAL                                                                                             
                                This is a decision on an appeal from the examiner’s final                                                                                              
                     rejection of claims 17 through 35.  No other claims are                                                                                                           
                     pending in the application.                                                                                                                                       

                                1 Application for patent filed March 7, 1995.                                                                                                          
                                                                                          1                                                                                            





Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007