Appeal No. 95-3698 Page 5
Application No. 08/006,717
to the claimed "pivotal means." Thus, it remains our view that
independent claim 27 and its dependent claims fail to
particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter
which the appellant regards as the invention.
In light of the foregoing, the appellant's request for
rehearing is granted to the extent of reconsidering our
decision, but is denied with respect to making any change
thereto.
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007